PRK v/s LASIK
PRK v/s LASIK




PRK and LASIK are the surgical procedures which are commonly compared by most of the people. Which method, of the two, is more convenient? This question usually confuses a patient who is anxious to correct his refractive errors.

 

Also See


Both the methods are used as refractive error correction method for myopia, hyperopia, astigmatism and presbyopia. Both PRK and LASIK are outpatient procedures that last for about 15 minutes per eye. While both procedures offer excellent and comparable results, there are some significant differences between PRK and LASIK. They include.

The procedure:


The chief difference between PRK and LASIK is in its surgical procedure. Photorefractive Keratectomy or PRK is a procedure in which, refractive vision correction is performed on the cornea’s surface. The front surface of the cornea is carved by the excimer laser. The surface layer known as the corneal epithelium is gently removed by the surgeon, which is regenerated within a few days.
LASIK offers refractive vision correction to be performed under corneal flap. Laser In Situ Keratomileusis or LASIK is a procedure that uses the excimer laser to reshape the cornea. A surgical instrument known as microkeratome creates a flap on corneal tissue that is attached by a hinge. The flap is gently pulled back and the corneal stroma is exposed. Once the cornea is treated by the laser and the cells are vapourised, the flap is replaced in its usual position.

Recovery:


Patients, on whom PRK is performed, start improving in three days time; while in LASIK, patients may recover on the same or the next day.

Remarkably, there is a more rapid improvement in vision and decreased discomfort with LASIK since the surface epithelial cells have been preserved and do not need to grow again. This is indisputably the reason that LASIK has become the most preferable corrective surgery for both doctors and patients. However, in some patients, PRK is a safer alternative to LASIK that may promise better outcomes. Patients who might benefit from PRK include those with less corneal tissue or in some patients with corneal irregularities or scars.

Post surgical uneasiness:
The post-operative discomfort may vary in PRK patients. Some feel pretty good while others feel the pain more because of scratchiness. The discomfort is minimal, as compared to PRK, after a LASIK surgery is performed.

Benefits:
In PRK there is less risk of dry eye, long term output same or better than with Lasik, 20/20 vision or better is usually achieved. In LASIK, there is almost no pain, better visual quality, typically 20/20 is achieved, immediate clear vision can be obtained, follow-up developments are easier if needed.

Risks Involved:
Since PRK requires more healing time than LASIK, the pain may cause complications after the surgery. The long-term outcomes may not be well established. There is a risk involved of an increase in the higher order aberrations which may lead to astigmatism.

Patients with thinner corneas may suffer less than ideal results, in LASIK surgery. Uneven flap edges may lead to higher order aberration or astigmatism. Post operational treatment is required in almost 5% of the cases.

 

     
 

 

 
PRK v/s LASIK  :